Board Says There is No Proof Murang'a Woman Was Forcibly Circumcised by Husband

The Anti-FGM Board says there is no medical proof that a Murang’a woman was forcibly circumcised by her husband and his friends.
Through a statement, the board’s chairperson Agnes Pareyio said claims by 38-year-old Hellen Wangui that she underwent forced female genital mutilation (FGM) could not be confirmed.
Citing a medical report, Pareiyo indicated that the woman was assaulted, and it is not clear whether her husband and his friends intended to circumcise her.
The board, however, noted that they are still conducting further investigations into the incident in collaboration with security officers.
Pareiyo expressed concerns over the rising cases of clitoridectomy in the Central Kenya region even as she warned those behind the retrogressive practice.
“FGM preference among the Kikuyu community is at 26 percent. It’s a worrying trend considering people from the central region are educated and well conversant with impacts associated with FGM,” Pareyio said.
“FGM is quite high in 22 counties. Murang’a is not one of them but we are investigating to know the reality and apprehend those who want to bring back the behaviors among the community.”
She mentioned Kisii, Maasai, Samburu, and Somali as the leading communities when it comes to FGM.
The Gikuyu, Embu, Meru Association (GEMA) Women Council of Elders this week petitioned the government to deregister and outlaw a traditional group dubbed Gwata Ndai for promoting gender-based violence practices such as female circumcision within the family setups.
Comments
Circumcised Wangui should…
Permalink
Circumcised Wangui should just higher some goons to forcibly circumcise Pareiyo who was bribed to defend her(Wangui’s) offenders.But I wonder whether the board is a court of law..
I think they checked her and…
Permalink
In reply to Circumcised Wangui should… by Morris Menye (not verified)
I think they checked her and found she was still intact..mbosho bado ilikua
She did not commit the act…
Permalink
She did not commit the act on herself .Who are you to decide for her crazy husband and his friends what their intentions were assuming they did not succeed and she ran off just in time.She still needs protection or do you help only when the act has been committed.Protect her from this crazy madman of a husband before she gets killed for speaking up
Who is this board to decide…
Permalink
Who is this board to decide on this case?. It's a criminal act and should be dealt with at a court of law. This Pareiyo and whoever wrote the medical report need to be checked if they are compromised. So did the victim have to undergo FGM so that it can be proved beyond reasonable doubt it actually happened? Did the victim assault herself or what is Pareiyo and the other mind readers explaination oh how it happened. Talk of throwing things under the carpet.
Add new comment